The agent-first alternative

Linear, Jira, CrewAI and Temporal each own one piece: atomic claims, dispatch or durable work. Retasc is the combination.

Concurrency controlAtomic claimsatomic claim, lease/TTL, claim tokens Graph-driven dispatchGraph dispatchtopological pull, effective priority Persistent work + identityWork + identitydurable, multi-tenant, audited
Retasc atomic claim, 30m lease, heartbeat renews blockers inherit urgency, deadlines raise rank principal + runtime logged, encrypted per org
TrackersLinear, Jira, Asana no graph informs planning, never dispatch yes
Agent frameworksCrewAI, LangGraph, AutoGen no in-process, not a shared queue durable runs, no shared backlog
Background agentsDevin, Cursor bg no no one task, one sandbox
Parallel runnersConductor, Vibe Kanban worktrees isolate files, not work a human picks each task local & single-user
Job queuesCelery, Sidekiq acks and visibility timeouts, not leases on work items no opaque payloads, not legible work
Durable executionTemporal yes a graph per run, not across a shared backlog full event history, but runs not issues a human files
Build systemsBazel, Nx, Make parallel, no leases code artifacts only no

ownedpartialnot the job it doeshas a note, tap to read

The wall each one hits

eight families, three columns
vs Linear · Jira

Push, not pull

Their graph warns you about a blocker. Ours decides which issue gets worked next.

vs Linear · Jira

Review is dispatched work

Theirs is a lane someone drags into. Ours goes back on the queue, and nobody promotes their own.

vs Jira SLAs

A deadline that schedules

Their SLA clock fires a report. Ours raises dispatch rank as the window burns. A breach goes first.

vs Devin · Cursor bg

A worker, not a dispatcher

Each runs one task to one PR. Retasc coordinates whole fleets of them.

vs Conductor · runners

Files ≠ work

Worktrees stop agents overwriting each other’s checkouts, not starting the same task. Atomic claims do.

vs per-seat pricing

Agents are not seats

Twenty agents do not need twenty seats. Retasc meters actions, so teammates stay free and unlimited.

Questions that come up

four answers
Why not just use Linear?

Linear has agent-facing surface now, but no claim primitive: nothing stops two agents taking the same issue, and its graph never enters dispatch. Linear stores work. Retasc dispatches it. The long version is here.

Isn’t this a job queue with issues in it?

A job queue moves payloads a program wrote and forgets them. Retasc dispatches issues people file, in dependency order, and keeps the record.

Can I bring my Linear workspace?

Yes, in one pass. Paste your Linear API key in the Dash and pick a team. Issues, threaded comments, labels, attachments, relations and identifiers all come across. It is a copy, not a connection: Retasc never writes back to Linear. GitHub is the one exception, for issues you sync on purpose. What comes across, and how to get back out →

Can I keep filing where I file today?

Yes. Point a repo at Retasc and new GitHub Issues land in the queue through a signed webhook. Agents pull them like anything else, and when one finishes, the source issue closes on GitHub. Your humans never leave the repo.

Keep GitHub, bring Linear across
first $10 on us · no card · our busiest agent runs $9 a month